RE: Figure 8-2 Implications for things other than corners

[FRC1625]

In your response to the original question... (If the "NOT OK" bumper corner indicated in <R08> "Overhead View" was changed to one of the "OK" bumper corners would the resultant bumper configuration for the robot base be legal?) you write ..."Figure 8-2 is intended to only illustrate the legality of some of the possible ways in which bumpers could be arranged on exterior corners. Please do not infer any other conclusions from that example."

Yet you additionally conclude the resulting bumper configuration would not be legal by answering "No". This begs the following question: would you please list the rules the resultant bumper configuration violates?

[GDC]

No. The referenced illustration was provided to provide insight into one particular clause of one rule. It was not intended to provide a complete example of every Robot Rule. To provide an exhaustive list of every rule violation that could be associated with a cartoon representation of a single instance of the rules would be imprudent.