Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Wedges and Rule <R19>

  1. #1
    FRC2177 Guest

    Default Wedges and Rule <R19>

    According to R19, "ROBOTS shall be designed so that opposing robots results in pushing rather than tipping or lifting." If a particular design doesnt meet the 10- degree requirement within the bumper zone, but could be shown to not lift or tilt another robot in a collision, may this be allowed? Would there be more leniency given if the parts that didnt meet the 10-degree requirement were made of some sort of pliable material (rubber, foam, etc)?
    Can anyone help us out with this? Many thanks!
    Team 2177

  2. #2
    FRC2177 Guest

    Default Wedges and Rule <R19>

    If a wedge-like mechanism is deployed to in order to harvest a trackball, but then is immediately retracted once the trackball is secured on top of the robot, would this be considered an infraction? The mechanism would only be deployed when the trackball was directly in front of the robot.
    Team 2177

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,777

    Default Re: Wedges and Rule <R19>

    Rule <R19> does not make exceptions for softer or more pliable materials. Rule <R19> does permit for extensions used beyond the bumper zone. If the extensions are not used as wedges against another robot, then they are permitted.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •