Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Clarification of IR Commands

  1. #1
    FRC1777 Guest

    Post Clarification of IR Commands

    Can the functions of the robocoach be used to set software states rather than specific robot movements. For example: Can IR command #1 set one register on the robot's controler and then a second IR command set the status of register two on the controller?

    Then based on these register's settings, the robot would perform certain functions.

    In other words, can the registers 10 do routine A, and register 01 do routine B, and register 11 do routine C.

    Only four commands would be set to the robot, but they would set registers not directly initiate robotic actions.

    Team 1777

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,777

    Default Re: Clarification of IR Commands

    This would depend on how the software system used the registers. If there was a one-to-one mapping between the transmitted functions/register settings and the resulting commands/actions, then it would satisfy the signaling requirements. But if the register settings were used to provide higher-order encoding to enable a larger potential command set (such as by using the four registers to represent four bits, which could provide a binary encoding of 16 potential commands), then that would be prohibited.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •