![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Regarding the GDC response to the post titled "Section 3, Rule G22: Clarification of Minibot contact when deploying", we were not requesting a design review, and we were in fact asking specifically about Rule G22. The intent of explaining a possible robot design was to help illustrate the question to better enable you to provide an accurate response. Here is our original question rephrased to more direct regarding Rule G22:
If a Hostbot/Minibot complies with G22, but the referee is unable to confidently determine such compliance (or inversely, confidently determine noncompliance) during the match, what does the referee specifically do? For instance: - Does the referee issue a penalty due to not being able to confidently determine compliance? - Does the referee not issue a penalty due to not being able to confidently determine noncompliance? - Does the referee inspect the robot for compliance/noncompliance after the match, but before the match is scored, so the match can then be scored appropriately (that is, no penalty)? - Does the referee inspect the robot for compliance/noncompliance after the match, but after the match is scored? If so, is a penalty for that match issued or not? - Something else? The same question could be posed about the playing configuration limit regarding the 84" diameter restriction. There is currently not a practical way during a match for a referee to determine if a robot was just inside/outside the 84" diameter limit. Thank you in advance for your response. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hypothetical game situations are highly context dependent. It is not practical for us to provide definitive answers for all individual situations which may be presented.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Springs on MiniBot Rule Clarification | 2011FRC0686 | Mechanical | 1 | 01-15-2011 07:31 PM |